Friday, April 24, 2009

 

Corvine franchise

Being stuck for stuff with which to drown out the ticking of the clock, I decided to watch the third and fourth Crow films.

I'm very fond of the original The Crow: it helped me write an essay on Hamlet when I was suffering from a nasty bout of scholar's block at university. Neither am I immune to the macabre twist that Brandon Lee died during the filming-- that always blows my mind.

It's amazing that they were able to finish the film and to do it so well- no matter how many times I watch it, I've never been able to see the strings.

Aha, ahem.

The second film, City of Angels, was, by contrast, unmitigated crap. I was therefore less than hopeful for installments III and IV.

First, I had to choose which one to watch first. Dan logic dictated to me that I should save whichever one was likely to be less awful for dessert. I checked the cast of each for helpful hints.

Part III has Kirsten Dunst. Damn. On the other hand, it does have that redneck cop out of The Shield. We'll call that even.

Part IV has... Edward Furlong. I think we have a winner.

I stuck on IV and it was consummately bad. Edward Furlong versus the four horsemen of the apocalypse, incarnate in the form of a quartet of failed actors. Straight to DVD? Straight to Channel 5, I reckon. Additional marks deducted for hokey attempt at Native American spirituality.

Having passed this stool, I was confident that III couldn't be as bad. The main character had shorter hair than usual, had been executed for murdering his girlfriend (which, of course, he hadn't) and busted out quite a few lines that wouldn't have been out of place in the original. It started brightly, got a bit silly, admittedly, and then the bad guys kidnapped Kirsten Dunst and sewed her damn mouth shut.

I was a huge fan of this- I mean, it would have been so much more trouble to have whacked a bit of duct tape over her mouth, right?

Even as I type, I have a hazy, guilty memory of telling a student long ago that the "duct" in "duct tape" is derived from the word "abduction."

Labels:


Tuesday, January 30, 2007

 

Fugu: why?

Read the following in the Yomiuri this morning:

One gram of blowfish poison is enough to kill 500 people.

According to the Health, Labor and Welfare Ministry, 14 people died of blowfish poisoning between 2002 and 2006.

In 2002, an unlicensed company in Hokkaido shipped a large amount of blowfish containing poisonous parts.

The metropolitan government certifies only those who have trained for more than two years under a licensed chef.

"Even professionals have trouble determining the poisonous part of some blowfish because they differ by type. The same fish needs to be checked by more than one person with proper knowledge," Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology Prof. Yuji Nagashima said.


All of which begs the following question: just how the bloody hell did the Japanese get so into eating Fugu in the first place? It seems like an absolute non-starter, doesn't it? The first five people to chow down turn purple and expire within three minutes; everybody else decides to persevere with this exciting new foodstuff.

According to Wikipedia, the Emperor is banned from eating Fugu.

Labels:


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Listed on BlogShares